Compliance & intelligence brain for engineering contractors

The ERP showsthe bleeding.Cingulbase finds the wound.

A passive intelligence layer that attaches to your existing systems — email, contracts, calendar, Teams — and continuously watches for what matters without asking anyone to change how they work.

Entering pilot phase with engineering contractors. Open for talks.
cingulbase://mcp/session
LIVE
Connect your AI agent
MCP Connected
AI AssistantCingul Base MCP

The numbers that matter

0%

of engineering projects experience scope creep — almost always starting as a verbal agreement in a meeting, a call, or a corridor conversation. By the time it hits the budget, the margin is gone.

PMI Pulse of the Profession 2021 — scope creep named the #1 driver of project cost overruns across professional services and engineering

0%

average net margin for European engineering contractors. One informal scope commitment, one missed certification, one cooling client relationship is enough to erase the year's profit on a project.

Deloitte European Construction & Engineering Sector Outlook 2024 — persistent margin compression driven by labour costs, scope disputes, and compliance incidents

0%

of critical project information lives in emails, voice calls, meetings, and PM heads — not in any system that can be flagged, audited, or read after they leave.

Nonaka & Takeuchi, The Knowledge-Creating Company (Oxford University Press, 1995) — foundational research, consistently validated across regulated industries

0×

the cost of fixing a compliance gap at audit versus catching it three months earlier. The signal was always there. Nobody was reading it.

McKinsey & Company — compliance cost amplification in regulated project environments (2023): early detection reduces remediation cost by 80–90%

The real problem

Margin leaks at the human layer,
not the financial one.

The ERP records the cost overrun. The cause happened three months earlier, in an email thread, a site call, a Friday afternoon verbal agreement. By the time the system shows it, the decisions that caused it are long gone.

PM failure mode 01

The overwhelmed PM

Four active projects. A client call on Friday afternoon. Additional scope agreed verbally — “we’ll sort the paperwork Monday.” Monday comes and goes. Three months later, the margin dispute lands and nobody can reconstruct what was said or when.

Cingulbase was in the room. It read the calendar, the email metadata, the signals. It flagged the gap before the weekend was over.
PM failure mode 02

The rogue PM

Some PMs make themselves the single point of access to a client. They manage what leadership sees. Verbal agreements the company doesn’t know about. When they leave or burn out, the client relationship leaves with them.

Client communication narrowing to one PM. No copies to leadership.
Verbal commitments accumulate. None in the contract. None in the system.
PM leaves. Client expects delivery of undocumented scope.
No record exists. The knowledge was never the company's to lose.

See it in action

The brain that never stops watching.

Any signal. Every gap surfaced.

Passive intelligence reading your email metadata, contracts, calendar, and meeting transcripts — cross-referencing against your obligations continuously. It does not wait for you to ask.

Did PM De Backer commit to anything on the Evonik call Thursday that's not in the contract?
Cingulbase
4 sources · Confidence: High
SIGNAL
Email + Calendar signal — PM De Backer × J. Deckers (Evonik), 12 JunProject BEL-C-2024 · Detected: email metadata + calendar entrySignal captured: 12 Jun 2026
"Subject pattern: additional cable routing trajectory. Calendar: 47-min call, client site. No change order created in the 5 days following."
CONTRACT
Contract BEL-C-2024 §3.4 — Scope change authorisation
§3.4: Any scope addition or modification requires a signed change order before execution begins. Verbal authorisation from client is explicitly insufficient. Estimated value of additional cable routing: €18,400.
GAP
GAP-BEL-C-2024-007 · CHANGE_NOTE_MISSING · Status: OPEN
No change order (CO-BEL-C-2024-xxx) found in contracts registry as of 17 Jun. Gap open 5 days. Client referenced this scope in follow-up emails 15 Jun and 17 Jun — execution risk increasing.
RULE
SPIE mandatory rule SR-002 — Verbal commitment formalisation
Verbal commitments from client contacts must be formalised in writing within 48 hours. Current status: 5 days elapsed, no formalisation. Severity: HIGH. Auto-escalation to PM supervisor in 2 days.

What it protects

Two signals. One brain.
Zero extra logins.

Detect verbal scope commitments before they become margin disputes
Monitor client sentiment through email metadata, CC patterns, and response latency
Flag certification and compliance obligation gaps automatically across all projects
Cross-reference meeting transcripts and voice memos against active contracts in real time
Surface PM overload and burnout signals before quality incidents follow
Answer audit readiness questions instantly — "Are we ready for Monday?" — with full context
Compliance, without the checklist.

Obligations monitored continuously — certifications, contract clauses, regulatory requirements. Gaps surface automatically. Nobody has to remember to check. The brain never forgets.

Sentiment, without the survey.

Client cooling and PM burnout detected through behavioural signals — response latency, CC patterns, communication breadth, language drift. No questionnaire. No self-reporting. Just honest signals.

VCA**ISO 9001ISO 14001Seveso IICAO 81PED 2014/68/EUATEX 2014/34/EUISO 45001+8 more

Private pilot — by invitation

Built for engineering contractors
who are done bleeding margin invisibly.

We’re piloting with a select group of engineering contractors in Belgium. A short conversation to see if there’s a fit. No demo environment — real data, real gaps, real signals.